Whence differences in value priorities? Individual, cultural, or artifactual sources

Ronald Fischer*, Shalom Schwartz

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

296 Scopus citations

Abstract

To what extent do value priorities vary across countries and to what extent do individuals within countries share values? We address these questions using three sets of data that each measure values differently: the Schwartz Value Survey for student and teacher samples in 67 countries (N = 41,968), the Portrait Values Questionnaire for representative samples from 19 European countries (N = 42,359), and the World Value Survey for representative samples from 62 countries (N = 84,887).Analyses reveal more consensus than disagreement on value priorities across countries, refuting strong claims that culture determines values.Values associated with autonomy, relatedness, and competence show a universal pattern of high importance and high consensus.Only conformity values show patterns suggesting they are good candidates for measuring culture as shared meaning systems.We rule out reference-group and response style effects as alternative explanations for the results and discuss their implications for value theory, cross-cultural research, and value-based intergroup conflict.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1127-1144
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
Volume42
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2011

Keywords

  • agreement
  • cultural differences
  • culture
  • intraclass correlation
  • reference group effects
  • unpackaging culture
  • values

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Whence differences in value priorities? Individual, cultural, or artifactual sources'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this