Abstract
This article suggests guidelines for identifying the ramifications of central elements of candidate selection methods for various democratic dimensions - participation, competition, representation and responsiveness - and analyses their possible role in supplying checks and balances. It proposes employing a three-stage candidate selection method: in the first stage a small committee appoints candidates to a shortlist; in the second stage a selected party agency may add or remove candidates using a special procedure (absolute majority vote, for example) and also ratify the re-adoption of incumbent candidates; and, finally, party members select candidates for safe seats or safe list positions among the proposed candidates. The article also recommends employing moderate requirements for candidacy; the use of a non-majoritarian voting method; and allowing the national centre a say in candidate selection.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 68-90 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | Government and Opposition |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 2009 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Which candidate selection method is the most democratic?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver