Which Jerusalem? A consideration of concepts and borders

Ira Sharkansky*, Gedalia Auerbach

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

'Jerusalem' conveys intensely spiritual meanings seeming to preclude political accommodation. A total solution that is absolutely clear to all parties seems impossible. Yet the several names, conceptions, and geographical denotations associated with the city offer options that lend themselves to creative and flexible negotiations that emphasize coping based on exploitation of the ambiguity inherent in the city's nature. More precisely, the intention is to blunt the emotions, whose source is religious, that the name 'Jerusalem' awakens, in a way that will allow coping in the realms of political and administration with greater success.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)395-409
Number of pages15
JournalEnvironment and Planning D: Society and Space
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2000

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Which Jerusalem? A consideration of concepts and borders'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this