Who Dislikes Whom? Affective Polarization between Pairs of Parties in Western Democracies

Noam Gidron*, James Adams, Will Horne

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Scopus citations

Abstract

While dislike of opposing parties, that is, affective polarization, is a defining feature of contemporary politics, research on this topic largely centers on the United States. We introduce an approach that analyzes affective polarization between pairs of parties, bridging the US two-party system and multiparty systems in other democracies. Analyzing survey data from twenty Western democracies since the mid-1990s, first, we show that partisans' dislike of out-parties is linked to elite policy disagreements on economic issues and, increasingly over time, also to cultural issues. Secondly, we argue and empirically demonstrate that governing coalition partners in parliamentary democracies display much warmer feelings toward each other than we would expect based on elite policy (dis)agreements. Third, we show that radical right parties are disliked much more intensely than we would expect based on policy disputes and coalition arrangements. These findings highlight the policy-based and institutional underpinnings of affective polarization.

Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)997-1015
Number of pages19
JournalBritish Journal of Political Science
Volume53
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 9 Jul 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press.

Keywords

  • coalitions
  • electoral institutions
  • ideology
  • polarization
  • radical right

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Who Dislikes Whom? Affective Polarization between Pairs of Parties in Western Democracies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this