Work, Identity, and the Regulation of Markets: A Study of Trademark Law in the United States and Germany

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article considers how legal systems capture different cultural perceptions of work in an individual's life. We inquire how two models - human capital, based on the works of Adam Smith; and vocation, based on the works of G. W. F. Hegel - are reflected in legal regulations and judicial rhetoric in the United States and Germany. Specifically, we examine how these two legal systems treat the practice of using personal names - the most direct referents to individuals' identities - in business. We discuss three sets of cases: cases involving the use of personal names as trademarks, cases involving conflicts between parties with similar names, and cases involving the transfer of rights in personal names. The article demonstrates that the US legal system treats work as a commercial asset, as human capital in Smith's sense, whereas German law perceives work as an integral part of one's identity, echoing the Hegelian line of vocation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1083-1112
Number of pages30
JournalLaw and Social Inquiry
Volume44
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Nov 2019

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Bar Foundation.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Work, Identity, and the Regulation of Markets: A Study of Trademark Law in the United States and Germany'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this