Wrongs and Wrongings: Bipolar Normativity and the Criminal Law

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

A standard view links private law to interpersonal obligations owed to others (bipolar obligations), while viewing criminal law as linked to obligations that are simply required, prohibited, or at most, owed to the state (monadic obligations). This paper interrogates the place of bipolar obligations in criminal law. It proposes a hybrid model, defending the primacy of the monadic wrong while making space for the relevance of bipolar wronging in criminal law.

Original languageEnglish
JournalCriminal Law and Philosophy
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.

Keywords

  • Moral worth
  • Wronging
  • Biopolar obligation
  • Criminal law
  • Impersonal values
  • Normativity
  • Punishment
  • Relational morality

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Wrongs and Wrongings: Bipolar Normativity and the Criminal Law'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this